And so it has commenced! The global roll out of 5G has begun with a number of countries worldwide racing to deploy this revolutionary cellular technology. 5G promises to be the biggest technological innovation the world has ever seen.
From next level Artificial Intelligence, such as self driving vehicles, to immense speed of internet connection – there is no question the technological advances that 5G would bring could be impressive to say the least.
However, just how much of this technology has been tested? How safe are these immense levels of radiofrequency deployed by 5G towers and the antennas that seem to be popping up everywhere?
As 5G technology is relatively new, there has been little to no research on its health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote one of the senior US officials. If you have already heard about EMF radiation, then you probably won’t be surprised to learn that the kind of RF (radiofrequency) wave used for some 5G signals hasn’t been thoroughly tested, nor have studies been conducted on its impact on human health. There is plenty of evidence out there regarding the adverse effects of 3G and even 2G. And there is reason to be concerned about 5G based on the lack of research involved with it.
If 5G is something you are unfamiliar with, or you know little about and are looking for more information, this guide aims to explore potential risks associated with 5G technology so you can draw well informed conclusions for yourself and make better decisions accordingly.
What is 5G and how has it evolved?
5G is a short-form term for “fifth-generation wireless telecom technology.” Any data transmitted by a cellular network will be impacted by it, including that sent by drones, security cameras, tablets, smartphones and other hi-tech devices.
The Evolution of 5G
For over a decade, we have all been using 4G, and it has worked pretty well. Having said that, this particular network has become quite crowded when you factor in the rapidly increasing network of smart devices.
Speeds supported by 4G cannot keep up with the demands of cutting edge technology. Artificial Intelligence is controlling more things than ever. Autonomous vehicle development is moving at a fast pace, and our existing network is too slow for them. These kinds of devices require quicker speeds and greater bandwidth. They need minimal latency, or lag-time.
Experts are calling 5G a chance for massive growth throughout a number of different industries. In other words, even though there is plenty of money invested in this technology, a lot more of it can be made by a lot of people. This investment level empowers telecommunications companies in a big way – particularly over current legislation.
5G: How It Works
As far as networks go, 5G operates slightly differently than 4G. It provides substantially quicker speeds, and therefore able to accommodate larger quantities of traffic, more so than 3G or 4G networks. This can be attributed to the frequencies that 5G network runs on.
Frequencies in a lower band of 5G networks generally operate between a range of 0.6 GHz (gigahertz) and 2.5 GHz. The range of these networks spans hundreds of square miles. And they are typically employed in rural areas.
Mid band 5G networks run between 2.5 GHz and 3.5 GHz, depending on where you are situated. The range in these frequencies spans several miles and therefore is more common in urban areas.
High band 5G networks will utilize millimeter waves that operate at much higher frequencies of 24GHz and higher, enabling the network to provide the fastest speed possible. This will, however, require a dense network of antennas and transmitters everywhere to achieve an uninterrupted data transmission, as the signal range of millimeter wave is limited.
The main difference between older cellular networks and 5G are these millimeter waves (MMWs), which fall in higher frequencies, usually ranging between 30 GHz and 300 GHz. By contrast, the network that your smartphone is connected to currently utilizes microwave bands that range between 700 MHz (megahertz) and 3 GHz.
MMWs are capable of transmitting vast amounts of data in short distances. Narrow beams directed by the transmissions travel by the line of sight. The data can be moved at high rates and with shorter latencies between the transmissions. Any obstacles like buildings and trees can block or reduce these beams. That’s why smaller cell antennas will have to be placed every 10 to 20 houses in urban areas to eradicate this ‘problem’ for 5G to ensure its effectiveness, thus hugely increasing mandatory exposure.
3G and 4G networks operate at a much lower frequency – and that is the primary reason 5G high band networks are as fast as they are. The congestion level is minimal at high frequencies.
With regard to latency, connectivity, and speed, 5G comes with a lot of advantages. However, will this be worth it?
5G Radiation: Is It Dangerous?
Unfortunately, to date there is still a lack of comprehensive research on 5G networks. Mid and low band 5G networks run at frequencies that are similar to modern technology. Therefore, the risks that are already known to exist with 2G through 4G networks are also inherent in low and mid band 5G networks.
With that said, besides the microwaves that are used in earlier cellular technologies, 5G will use MMWs, or millimeter waves, for the first time. Sadly, not very many studies have been done on extended exposure to low-intensity MMWs. Further, there is a lack of research on MMW exposure used in conjunction with other types of radiofrequency (RF) radiation.
Due to MMW’s limited reach, 5G will warrant cellular antennas between every 100/200 m or so, exposing everyone to MMW radiation. New technologies have been employed by 5G as well, such as MIMO – multiple inputs and mass outputs; phased arrays; and active antennas that are capable of forming beams, which present unique challenges, as far as quantifying exposure is concerned.
RF Radiation Exposure Risks
The facts and knowledge about the hazards of EMF (Electromagnetic Field) radiation exposure have been well documented for the last century.
There has been vast amount of scientific research conducted over the last several decades warning the medical profession and governments about the risks of exposure to EMF radiation and its link to health issues like impact on DNA, neurasthenic disorder, hemodynamic, cardiovascular, neurological diseases and many others.
Studies recently conducted by renowned scientists have discovered a correlation between heightened cancer risk and ongoing cell phone usage.
In 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of World Health Organisation (WHO), classified all RF radiation in the frequency range of 30 kHz – 300 GHz (of which all mobile signals are part of) as a ‘possible’ human carcinogen, Group 2B.
More recent scientific studies that followed IRAC findings have further strengthened the evidence of the negative effects of RF radiation.
“These results add scientific evidence to a previous evaluation. Thus, RF radiation may now be classified as human carcinogen, Group 1. That is the strongest classification which is the same as for e.g., asbestos and smoking” L Hardell and R Nyberg, the comments paper on Appeals on the Deployment of 5G.
Following the 2-year long study by the US NTP (National Toxicology Program), the findings provided a concrete evidence that the cell phone radiation instigated heart and brain tumors and DNA damage in animals. The research evaluated exposure to RF (radiofrequency) radiation at the frequencies used in 3G and 2G smartphones, typically in the range between 700 MHz and 2700 MHz.
Another very notable study by Ramazzini Institute (RI) involved testing carcinogenic effects that came with RFR exposure at levels that were consistent with radiation emitted by cell towers at the exposures that are legally considered ‘safe’. The discoveries were akin to the ones produced by NTP, as mentioned earlier. RI’s Director of Research stated the following:
“Our findings of cancerous tumors in rats exposed to environmental levels of RF are consistent with and reinforce the results of the US NTP studies on cell phone radiation, as both reported increases in the same types of tumors of the brain and heart in Sprague-Dawley rats. Together, these studies provide sufficient evidence to call for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to re-evaluate and re-classify their conclusions regarding the carcinogenic potential of RFR in humans.”
There are a variety of other studies that were performed to evaluate the effects of RF radiation, all reflecting similar results.
On the other hand, millimeter waves, the very edge that differentiate 5G from its predecessors, hasn’t had as laborious research as microwaves so far.
What are the effects of millimeter waves and what do we know so far?
Risks of exposure to millimeter waves
As many side effects the microwaves, or the low and mid bands, have proven to have, it’s the millimeter waves (MMW) that differentiate 5G from prom its predecessors. Further extensive studies are required on MMWs to establish a clear paradigm here, and as such, at this point, it is difficult to determine the health risks associated with this type of frequency radiation.
The earliest studies on millimeter waves were conducted in Eastern Europe and later published by the US Central Intelligence Agency (the paper was later declassified in 2012) examined MMW radiation exposure on mice and rats. For fifteen minutes each day, and sixty days straight, the rats were exposed to frequencies that ranged between 37 GHz and 60 GHz. The findings were then contrasted to human exposure who worked with millimeter wave generators.
Below is an extract of a document published revealing the findings, which you can read in full here:
Later studies have also linked exposure to millimeter waves to the heating of the skin.
Dr. Joel Moskowitz, director of the Center for Family and Community Health at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health, University of California, pointed out this phenomena in his article “5G Wireless Technology: Millimeter Wave Health Effects”:
“Millimeter waves (MMWs) are mostly absorbed within 1 to 2 millimeters of human skin and in the surface layers of the cornea. Thus, the skin or near-surface zones of tissues are the primary targets of the radiation. Since skin contains capillaries and nerve endings, MMW bio-effects may be transmitted through molecular mechanisms by the skin or through the nervous system.”
“Thermal effects occur when the power density of the waves is above 5–10 mW/cm2. Such high-intensity MMWs act on human skin and the cornea in a dose-dependent manner—beginning with heat sensation followed by pain and physical damage at higher exposures. Temperature elevation can impact the growth, morphology and metabolism of cells, induce production of free radicals, and damage DNA.”
“The maximum permissible exposure that the FCC permits for the general public is 1.0 mW/cm2 averaged over 30 minutes for frequencies that range from 1.5 GHz to 100 GHz. This guideline was adopted in 1996 to protect humans from acute exposure to thermal levels of radiofrequency radiation. However, the guidelines were not designed to protect us from nonthermal risks that may occur with prolonged or long-term exposure to radiofrequency radiation.”
It’s important to add, that the guidelines adopted in 1996 are mainly based on research from the 1980s and do not take into consideration ‘signalling properties’ of RF radiation. These are, however, important due to their effect on the exposure and therefore impact on health.
Studies have also revealed that exposure over a short-term to MMW radiation at low intensities is capable of making bacteria antibiotic-proof. In one of such published reviews of the research in 2016 it stated:
“Changing the sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics by MMW irradiation can be important for the understanding of antibiotic resistance in the environment. In this respect, it is interesting that bacteria that survived near telecommunication-based stations like Bacillus and Clostridium spp. have been found to be multidrug resistant (Adebayo et al. 2014).” (Soghomonyan et al., 2016)
There is another issue with MMWs, because the range of the signal at these higher frequencies is limited, more transmitters will be needed. As such, rather than having large cell towers that are highly powered each half-mile, give or take, we will have smaller antennae and transmitters on the thousands on lampposts, street signs, buildings, and other objects.
These smaller transmitters have their pros and cons. While they are enabling transmission of signals at high network speeds, they are also closing the gap on 5G radiation, putting it closer to our bodies then ever before.
Ultimately, when it comes to 5G, we don’t fully know what the full ramifications of exposure will be. People that live close to 5G antennas might be susceptible to even higher levels of radiation exposure for long durations.
More research is needed before this technology is rolled out on a mass scale. However, to date, unfortunately, not much comprehensive research seems to be in development.
What is being done globally about it?
Over the years there have been many debates around the possible risks that 5G could cause, many assure there is no risk. Meanwhile telecom giants are rushing to deploy 5G coverage nation-wide. There are many interested parties with deep interests and deep pockets, one way or another, in having this technology spread as wide and as fast as it is possible.
A number of medical and scientific research papers that predate early 90s have been warning the medical profession and governments about the risks of exposure to EMF radiation. These research papers chronicle the consequences of exposure – particularly regarding the health effects on people who are exposed to EMF radiation.
Besides the research, there were hundreds of letters sent out worldwide by the doctors, researchers and scientists all asking to pause 5G rollouts. And numerous international appeals have been published on RF radiation, its affects on health and the environment.
In 2015 International Appeal backed by a coalition of over 200 international scientists, involved in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields, urging United Nations and World Health Organisation to ensure that public is fully informed about the potential health risks from EMF radiation and called for more transparent disclosures about the dangers of EMF.
A couple years later in 2017 a group of over 300 international scientists and medical doctors joined the 5G Appeal to the European Union (EU) calling for an immediate moratorium to halt the roll out of 5G network due to potential serious health effects, stating that “RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”
Unfortunately, despite several engagement attempts that have been made to date, no positive response has been obtained.
In the comments paper on Appeals on the Deployment of 5G by L Hardell, Department of Oncology, Orbrero University (Sweden) and R Nyberg, Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Abo Akademi University (Finland) it stated:
“Unfortunately, decision makers seem to be uninformed or even misinformed about the risks. EU officials rely on the opinions of individuals within the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non‑Ionizing Radiation Protection) and the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR), most of whom have ties to the industry. They seem to dominate evaluating bodies and refute risks.. The responses from the EU seem to have thus far prioritized industry profits to the detriment of human health and the environment.”
The ICNIRP’s issued guidelines on radiofrequency exposure were concerned only about short term heating (or thermal) effects from radiation. And these were the guidelines that were adopted by most countries around the world. The ICNIRP’s guidelines were originally produced a couple of decades ago. And while these were later updated in 2009, no changes were made to reflect the features of a new RF signal from the modern technologies, nor were any changes made about the rapidly growing proof of dangerous effects that come from it.
In collaboration with major telecom organizations and the WHO (the World Health Organisation), the ICNIRP has made significant efforts to ensure nations around the world adhere to their guidelines. With that said, even the outdated guidelines could be exceeded with the spread of fifth generation RF radiation, and therefore these could become an obstacle for 5G rollout.
‘The ICNIRP exposure limits are dependent on an unproven hypothesis that “only heat from EMF can cause health hazards”. This hypothesis has clearly been rejected in a large number of scientific studies.’
The ICNIRP’s guidelines may contradict most scientific reports that evidence harmful adverse effects from RF radiation. Supported by major telecom giants, ICNIRP has achieved a fair success in imposing their views on countries all around the globe. What it seems to be a reluctance to listen to clear warnings from subject matter experts is of a concern and potential neglection of health risks.
Another big concern is what is appears to be a conflict of interest among people in assessment groups, given their involvement or association with the telecom sector. The same people are also usually part of other industry or regulatory bodies, and as such, they often may be representing a functioning that of a cartel.
In the US, the obstacles to a widespread 5G deployment have been removed by the federal government. Most regulations that existed were revoked for the sake of spurring progress. Local states, governments, and citizens alike have endeavored to challenge the repeal of certain FCC regulations that pertain to telecom organizations.
In response to these calls, FCC implemented a regulation that allows seizing local control of properties like utility poles in order to place 5G towers or antennas on them. This is being done to advance 5G adoption, simplifying process for telecom firms. The US Conference of Mayors claims that this act has misapplied federal law, and has stripped property rights away from local communities.
Those who stand to benefit from 5G implementation say that 5G technology meets the Federal Safety Standards, however these themselves are widely refuted by many subject matter experts.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in its letter stated that “The FCC’s current [radio frequency/microwave] exposure guidelines.. are thermally based, and do not apply to chronic, non-thermal exposure situations…. The generalization by many that the guidelines protect human beings from harm by any or all mechanisms is not justified…. There are reports that suggest that potentially adverse health effects, such as cancer, may occur…. Federal health and safety agencies have not yet developed policies concerning possible risk from long-term, non-thermal exposures.”
You’d think that governments would adopt stronger regulations and health warnings based on numerous red flags raised by a substantial body of researchers. However, it’s not as straight forward as it seems. Dr. Joel Moskowitz explains:
“Unfortunately, as with many other issues, like tobacco, or asbestos, or various chemicals, or global warming, for that matter, there is a body of researchers who are basically defending the industry-promoted guidelines that have been adopted by the FCC and by the ICNIRP, which is the international equivalent of the FCC, which the WHO relies upon.”
“And very recently, a team of investigative journalists identified 14 scientists, actually named them, who defend these obsolete exposure guidelines and they do so by preparing biased reviews of the literature for various health agencies around the world.. There may be another dozen EMF scientists around the world who take a similar position as these researchers, but mostly in the U.S. we’re hearing from non-EMF researchers, people who’ve never published EMF research — typically physicists, engineers, sometimes oncologists, who are defending the FCC guidelines saying the only risks are short-term and due to heating.”
While various attempts are being made by states and local governments to address the issue, it is not enough at this stage. Until it is proven that 5G cellular technology is safe, regulations that matter should be strengthened not eased up. If this technology does have long term health effects, they won’t show up until several years later after we all have been exposed to it.
How do you protect yourself?
The impact of EMF radiation is cumulative rather than immediate. In other words, the more radiation one is exposed to for a longer period of time the more chances of being harmed by it.
We know that 5G will expose us to a significantly higher amounts of radiation than before. Crucially, it will be more paramount then ever before to reduce the overall exposure to it as best as we can.
To reduce the overall exposure to RF radiation, there are several things you can do. Although not all steps may be practical for everyone, it is about making the most of the protective measures available out there. For instance, someone who lives in a metropolitan area would take more assertive steps, more so than an individual who resides in a fairly rural setting.
So let’s take a look at some protective measures that you can take.
Determining radiation levels around you
As they say what gets measured gets managed (or gets done). First of all, you’d want to measure the radiation levels around you, whether it is in your home, work or wherever you spend significant time in.
Establishing if you reside close to a 5G cell tower may not always be a straight forward process. Checking local coverage maps of your cell carrier may be helpful in that regard.
Third party websites can also be used to pinpoint the location of cell towers and antennas in your area and near your home. Antennasearch.com shows a detailed map of all the towers and antennas in the US, providing quite extensive information on exact addresses for registered cell towers.
Another one to check out is Speedtest.net/ookla-5g-map – it offers an interactive map of all 5G rollouts around the world. You can zoom in right on your city/area to locate the 5G tower nearest to you, although it won’t show locations of individual 5G antennas.
You can also measure the strength of the signal yourself to determine how much of it reaches your home. The challenge is that the regular EMF meters can detect mid-band and lower frequencies (and they are still very effective at measuring these frequencies), however, they cannot detect millimeter waves, or high band frequencies. You will require a meter that can measure frequencies within a range of 29 GHz and higher.
Spectrum analyzer is one of the best ways of detecting MMW frequencies. As costly as these devices are, if you are thinking of acquiring one, look for a spectrum analyzer that can detect high frequencies – specifically 24 GHz or higher.
If spectrum analyser is not an option, a quality EMF is still a better option than nothing at all and will still let you measure levels of EMF radiation within the sub-range of 8 GHz. When choosing EMF meters, make sure the meter is capable of measuring RF radiation and not just magnetic and electric fields. When it comes to 5G, it’s the RF radiation that we are concerned about. Read EMF meter guide for more information.
After radiation levels have been measured in your home, and you have discovered that you live near enough to a 5G tower to require action to be taken, there are some steps you can take to reduce an overall radiation in your home.
Minimising radiation exposure in your home
The objective is to develop an area that a 5G signal cannot penetrate. In other words, you are creating a safe retreat free from radiation. You’ll still face 5G radiation exposure when outside of your home, but your exposure as a whole will be substantially minimized.
Here are some of the ways how you can minimise RF radiation in your home.
- Minimise use of cell phones or using protective casing
No matter how powerful a cell tower is, what its proximity to your home, or how effective its network is, our choices and devices are what exacerbate the danger.
Our cell phones are one of the most prevalent EMF radiation sources in our day to day being due to their power and closeness to us.
To reduce the risk of harm, it helps to minimize the use of cell phones and cordless phones. Use a landline whenever possible. And if you still need to use your cell phone, use a good quality cellphone case, such as DefenderShield, to protect your brain and body from the vast majority of this radiation. Tested in FCC certified laboratories, DefenderShield protective case blocks almost 100% of EMF radiation emitted by the cell phones.
Even if you opt to use 5G down the road, that will undoubtedly transmit more radiation, the protective case should still help to reduce overall radiation reaching your brain.
In addition, taking steps like reducing your smartphone use, using speakerphones and headphones such as Airtube instead of keeping the device close to your head will be beneficial in reducing the risk of harm.
Also try keeping your phone away from your body when you can. Ten inches distance between your body and your phone results as high as 10,000x reduction in exposure as compared to 1/10th of an inch distance.
When possible, avoid using your phone when the signal is weak, for example in lifts and cars, as metal framing may interfere with the signal. This is because cell phones are designed to increase emitted radiation when reception is weak.
Finally, using an airplane mode whenever you can, while it won’t eliminate all of the radiation the phone is emitting, will vastly reduce radiation by eliminating the cellular connection. With that said, since we are more connected than we ever have been, cell phones are all but a necessity. As such, a high quality case is essential.
- Create protective shell in your house
The fact is, we can’t escape from exposure to 5G radiation while we are outside, however we can create an RF signal free zone inside our house. In doing so, consider applying protection around your interior or exterior walls, such as shielding paint or EMF barrier against the wall.
EMF paints contain shielding qualities, such as natural graphite and black carbon, that can protect against EMF radiation and even 5G frequencies.
A high-quality option can be costly, but you will only need to get it once. Chose brands that make high quality EMF protection paint and can block the vast majority of the radiation. Brands like YShield produce high quality paint that can not only block frequencies as high as 18 GHz by 99.995% but also shields 5G frequency attenuating 5G spectrums up to 40 GHz. The paint typically warrants a couple of coats and serves as a base coat. As such, it can be covered up with your choice of color. It is worth noting that the paint will need to be grounded by a licenced electrician.
An added bonus to YShield’s paint is that it’s also eco friendly as it’s made from untreated natural graphite and black carbon with the lowest emission on the market.
Besides EMF paint, you can also use an EMF barrier. For instance, if you live close to a 5G high band tower, then an EMF barrier can be placed against whatever wall faces the tower. EMF barriers are normally made from a combination of copper, nickel and aluminum. This option could also be cheaper than applying EMF paint all over your house.
One of the brands that makes quality EMF barriers is RadiantGUARD. Their Ultima Radiant Barrier resembles a giant aluminum foil roll. It’s simple to apply – all you need to do is wrap foil around the windows and walls in your home, as well as beneath your roof’s panel, along with other places that require shielding.
As an additional preventative measure, if you’re worried about some radiation still penetrating your house and particularly the bedroom, you can use an EMF shielding blanket when you sleep. When searching for blankets, look at the quality and protection features. DefenderShield EMF radiation protection blanket contain multiple layers of shielding and is made out of hypoallergenic organic bamboo cloth that also feels quite comfortable and warm.
- Other Important Protective Measures
There are a number of other important tactical strategies to help you reduce your overall exposure to RF radiation, including the following:
- Wired over wireless – chose hardwire internet connection to your home instead of using WiFi;
- Smart meter covers – placing EMF cages over smart meters can contain radiation that is emitted by them.
- Plants can purify air circulating within your household. One particular plant that seems to thrive in indoor settings are cacti. NASA has tested cactus plants out in their International Space Station and discovered that they can literally purify air and produce clean oxygen.
Note, none of the above single measures alone will provide full protection from 5G millimeter wave radiation. However, the combination of multiple preventative measures can significantly reduce your overall exposure to radiation and will be your best bet in the long run. Minimizing exposure while you are at home will allow your body to reset from 5G’s adverse effects that you accumulate while being outside.
Check radiation levels after protective measures have been installed
To evaluate how the preventive steps you are taking are working, use a spectrum analyzer or EMF meter discussed above to quantify the new levels of radiation levels in the house. Each room within the home should be tested before a protective solution is installed and measurements recorded. It may be helpful to repeat this process after every protective measure is installed. You should notice a substantial difference in EMF radiation levels, although it’s the frequency range of 29 GHz or higher that is of a particular interest.
As 5G technology evolves and becomes more widespread, more products will hopefully become available that can effectively block MMW frequencies. In the meantime, though, certain products can still reduce the frequencies you are exposed to. Ultimately, some reduction is better than no reduction.
Use inverse-square law of physics to your advantage
Use distance to your advantage. Think of inverse-square law of physics which states that the exposure to the radiation levels is reduced by a quarter as we double our distance from the source, whether it’s a cellphone, cell tower or any other EMF radiation emitting source.
Reducing EMF radiation exposure as best you can will be to your benefit, especially when you consider how cumulative biological damages are.
Final but nonetheless important point..
Groups and individuals continue to speak out and advocate against 5G mass deployment. Dozens of online petitions are being signed at the state and wider levels to halt the 5G widespread roll out until further research is carried out to assess the full impact of 5G cellular technology before the harm induced by its radiation is irreversible.
If you feel like speaking out and you are comfortable with it, you can write to your local and federal officials and health and safety agencies urging them to take action in order to protect the public and environment from 5G potential hazards. The Parents for Safe Technology have provided very helpful pack of resources and information on their Take Action page that you can use.
The underdog should not be underestimated. There are steps you can take to push back.
Although one individual may not be enough to stand up to the regulators, people who unite can make a difference. Don’t forget that the cigarette sector had no choice but to reveal the dangerous effects produced by their products because of people’s collective will.
Teach your family and friends about the hazards that come with 5G technology. Show them any existing research about it. Our government and politicians will have no choice but to listen to the people when enough of them express concerns.
In Closing
In the words of Dr. Joel Moskowitz: “The deployment of 5G, or fifth-generation cellular technology, constitutes a massive experiment on the health of all species.”
The findings from the studies carried out so far should not be underestimated and should serve as early warning signs of risks that this technology could come with, especially on a global scale. Live testing on humankind should not transpire, because the repercussions could be irreversible.
5G does come with its fair share of concerns. Fortunately, though, there are steps you can take to not only protect yourself, but to fight back against the roll out of untested technology.
Keeping your house and your loved ones protected from 5G starts with minimizing 5G radiation exposure.
It is also imperative that you spread awareness about this matter. More people will find out about it if more people speak up.
Whatever you do, don’t let the fear of 5G prevent you from living your life. Take comfort in the fact that there are things being done to fight back and there are measures you can take to protect yourself.
More to Explore
